Re: doc package conventions

[Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>]

Hi Daniel,

Le 09/07/2014 09:17, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
> 
> https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/x110.html
> 
> - should the doc package be named ${BINARY_PACKAGE}-doc or
> ${SOURCE_PACKAGE}-java-doc or something else?

For Java libraries the -doc suffix is added to the name of the binary
package, that gives libfoo-java and libfoo-java-doc.


> - for libfoo-java, should the foo-java-doc or libfoo-java-doc package
> install docs to
>     /usr/share/doc/libfoo-java  or
>     /usr/share/doc/libfoo-java-doc or something else?

To /usr/share/doc/libfoo-java, and the Javadoc goes in the 'api'
subdirectory (so not 'apidocs' as seen sometimes).

Emmanuel Bourg