Re: TestNG to unstable

[Eugene Zhukov <jevgeni.zh@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 8:52 AM, tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> wrote:
> On 10/02/2013 10:32 PM, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> TestNG has been in experimental for some time now. Could someone
>> please upload it to unstable?
>>
>> Any objections to that?
>
> Hi Eugene,
>
> It looks like the package has been in experimental for just over 2
> weeks.  Do you know the status of the reverse build-dependencies when
> using the version in experimental?  Verifying that the migration won't
> introduce FTBFS bugs is the next step.
>
> $ reverse-depends -b testng
> Reverse-Build-Depends-Indep
> ===========================
> * jing-trang
> * libhamcrest-java
> * libhibernate-validator-java
> * libjgroups-java
> * libspring-java
> * sisu-ioc
> * surefire
>
> Reverse-Build-Depends
> =====================
> * gradle
> * picard-tools

Thanks Tony. I did a quick look into unstable, and here is what I got:

Reverse-Build-Depends-Indep
===========================
OK * jing-trang
OK * libhamcrest-java
FTBFS * libhibernate-validator-java fails because of classifier in
testng dependency I guess
OK * libjgroups-java
? * libspring-java
FTBFS * sisu-ioc same as above
OK * surefire

Reverse-Build-Depends
=====================
? * gradle
OK * picard-tools

If anyone has an easy way to check libspring-java and gradle I'd
appreciate that. Also help with fixing those failing packages is also
very much appreciated.

Thanks,
Eugene