Re: jmock2

[Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>]

#721538 is easy to fix, but the API changes implied by #717122 would be
better dealt by upstream. An alternative would be to build jmock
explicitly with openjdk6, but that would prevent its removal from Jessie.

Is jmock required by the core of openjpa or only some of its unit tests?
Disabling some tests could be a simple workaround.

Emmanuel Bourg


Le 02/09/2013 16:14, Stephen Nelson a écrit :
> There's a bug in the jmock project [1] that is blocking the packaging
> of openjpa. There is also the more severe FTBFS bug [2] which might
> require a breaking change to the api according to the author [3]. I
> was intending to look into this in more detail and attempt to fix this
> if no one else is working on it at the moment?
> 
> Many thanks,
> 
> Stephen
> 
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721538
> [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717122
> [3] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jmock.devel/527
> 
>