On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:55:22AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Could you please confirm whether or not patches for #605940, #605941 > can safely be removed from xmlgraphics-commons 1.5 ? Did you forward > issues upstream (link would be nice). Did they agree with your > proposed changes ? Do you have a package against which I can test? As far as the patches, when I forward a bug upstream, I set the forwarded flag in the Debian BTS. From the upstream BTS, it looks like the patch for 605941 has been accepted, and the other one is still pending; it looks like the Apache BTS didn't accept the comment I tried to email it. I don't really have the time (or the desire) to learn how to write JUnit tests in order to satisfy upstream, so until someone does that, the latter patch will probably not go in and Debian will have to carry it. -- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US +1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature