Re: RFS: eclipse-cdt-qt

[Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>]

On 2012-02-02 22:41, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> This license in itself is discriminating against users, so it has to go
>> in non-free unless we can obtain it under a better license.
> 
> for completeness I paste here a link to analysis I got from debian-legal
> [1]
> (nothing much new there). I will try to contact upstream and clarify the
> license.
> 
> Hopefully Nokia will allow me to use the code under free license because
> as I
> found out some files are already available under LGPL, for example
> qswt/shared/shared_global_p.h is a private header distributed with Qt.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Jakub
> 
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/02/msg00002.html
> 
> 

Actually, we can replace the private headers with clearly LGPL-licensed
counterparts, it should be ok.  I recall doing something like this with
tijmp.

~Niels