Re: RFS: lwjgl

[Michael Gilbert <michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com>]

Niels Thykier wrote:

> So, turns out I was wrong about javahelper - the package uses
> jh_installjavadoc in its override_dh_auto_install, so now it FTBFS.
> Though please note that you are missing a jh_clean in the clean
> rule/override_dh_auto_clean.
> 
> Also while you have added the B-D for jutils.jar none of the packages
> have any relation to said package.  As far as I can tell jinput needs
> jutils, but jinput does not have any classpath.  If lwjgl needs jutils
> directly (mind you, I do not know if this is the case), then lwjgl needs
> a Depends on jutils as well.
>   Otherwise, if jutils is in the classpath in d/rules as a workaround
> for the missing classpath in jinput, please file a bug against jinput
> about this and document in d/rules why jutils is listed in classpath.
>   This ought to have been a part of my original review, but I did not
> notice jinput did not have a classpath then.

OK, that clarifies things ;)  I've made these updates and pushed.
Please review.

Thanks again,
Mike