[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Lintian java checks testing



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi

Recently Vincent Fourmond created a couple of java checks and most of
them have been committed the Lintian git repository.  I have compiled a
snapshot build that I hope you will try out on some of your packages and
provide me with a bit of feedback.

The snapshot build can be downloaded from [1] or alternatively you can
clone the git repository and run lintian directly from there[2].  The
snapshot deb currently has a false-positive on the relative classpath
check if the Class-Path in the manifest uses file:/// instead of just /,
this has been fixed in git.

While I personally am okay with feedback on any change in Debian, the
new java/jar related ones are the following:

      - classpath-contains-relative-path
      - jar-not-in-usr-share
      - executable-jar-without-main-class
      - missing-dep-on-jarwrapper
      - missing-classpath
      - javalib-but-no-public-jars
      - missing-manifest
      - codeless-jar

Feel free to follow up here or to #620829.

Thank you in advance,
~Niels

[1] http://people.debian.org/~nthykier/

[2] Assuming $LINTIAN_DIR is the location of the git clone:

LINTIAN_ROOT="$LINTIAN_DIR" $LINTIAN_DIR/froentend/lintian

Making a small shell script is recommended for extended usage :)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=JWJZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: