Re: RFS: java-xmlbuilder (new package)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-03-10 16:56, James Page wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "java-xmlbuilder".
>
> * Package name : java-xmlbuilder
> Version : 0.4-1
> Upstream Author : James Murty
> * URL : http://code.google.com/p/java-xmlbuilder/
> * License : Apache-2.0
> Section : java
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> libjava-xmlbuilder-java - XML Builder Java library for creating XML
> documents
> libjava-xmlbuilder-java-doc - Documentation for XML Builder Java library
> for creating XML documents
>
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
> The upload would fix these bugs: 617526
>
> My motivation for maintaining this package is: this package is a
> dependency of jets3t (which currently bundles it) and of jclouds (yet to
> be packaged). jets3t used by the Jenkins ec2 Plugin (which I intend to
> package alongside Jenkins).
>
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/java-xmlbuilder
> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
> main contrib non-free
> - dget
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/java-xmlbuilder/java-xmlbuilder_0.4-1.dsc
> - Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/pkg-java/java-xmlbuilder.git
>
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
> Cheers
>
> James
>
Hey
Uploaded to NEW. My only comment is that the doc package does not
recommend on default-jdk-doc; possibly because it is not linked against
the said doc. Could you please look into that for a -2 or the next
upstream release?
~Niels
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=wCXG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: