Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:21:15 +0200 with message-id <4BC1DADB.2090004@thykier.net> and subject line java-common: JAVA POLICY: define default JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/java as alternative. has caused the Debian Bug report #283557, regarding java-common: JAVA POLICY: define default JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/java as alternative. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 283557: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=283557 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: java-common: JAVA POLICY: define default JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/java as alternative.
- From: Eric Lavarde <debian.bugs.nospam@zorglub.s.bawue.de>
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:02:06 +0100
- Message-id: <20041129210034.611A15CC66@bender.bawue.de>
Package: java-common Version: 0.22 Severity: wishlist Hi, my suggestion would be to define the directory /usr/lib/java as default java-home, so that someone can define a default value for the variable JAVA_HOME, which some utilities seem to require. I think of something like the following in a shell script: ${JAVA_HOME:=/usr/lib/java} Cheers, Eric -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 283557-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: java-common: JAVA POLICY: define default JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/java as alternative.
- From: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
- Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:21:15 +0200
- Message-id: <4BC1DADB.2090004@thykier.net>
Hi I am closing this bug since it has been marked as wontfix for 5-6 years and there does not seem to have been any interest in redeeming the proposal. ~NielsAttachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---