[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#173461: marked as done (FAQ: gjdoc references)

Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:31:09 +0200
with message-id <4BBB8BFD.6020701@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#173461: FAQ: gjdoc references
has caused the Debian Bug report #173461,
regarding FAQ: gjdoc references
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
173461: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=173461
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: java-common
Version: 0.16
Severity: normal

Hi,
  Sections 1.6.9 and 5.1.7 of the Debian Java FAQ are both about free
javadoc implementations. At present, nither of them refer to gjdoc. This
is quite a shame as gjdoc is truly free and truly a javadoc replacement.
gjdoc is not perfect in what it does, but is improving and by the next
release will be quite useable for most purposes.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux pathfinderii.chu.cam.ac.uk 2.4.18 #16 Mon Apr 22 11:33:37 BST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 0.35

This has been fixed in 0.35 (or presumably earlier)

~Niels

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: