Re: RFS: sisc
I have uploaded a new package for sisc in response to Torsten's points.
On 28 July 2010 19:04, Torsten Werner <twerner@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:10 PM, David Banks <amoebae@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sisc".
>
> I have some questions / notes:
>
> - Is there a reason for not putting the jar files into /usr/share/java
> to comply to the Debian java policy?
I now install the jars to /usr/share/java in compliance with the policy.
> - May you split the changes to the upstream sources into individual
> patches into debian/patches please?
This is now done.
> - What is means with "Relies on the java2-runtime virtual package,
> which is not by default available in Debian main." in README.Debian?
Ah, that was from the old debian packaging by the maintainer, which I
adapted. (Statement was probably accurate in those days.) I have now
removed this file altogether, as it contained nothing else.
> - Please add the full text of the MPL to debian/copyright.
Now done in DEP-5 form.
> - Prerm should only remove alternatives when called with 'remove' as
> the first argument to avoid overwriting user made changes during
> upgrades.
Done.
> - The file seems to have a different license. Please check again.
Not quite sure what you mean here? which file?
Thanks for your time.
Cheers,
--
David Banks <amoebae@gmail.com>
Reply to: