Hi > I'm trying to understand which is the current maintainance status for > libjgrapht-java. This package got added and removed some times into and= > from different distributions with different names, so it's not entirely= > clear to me who is caring after it at the moment. >=20 I think it was just a source rename - presumably to allow multiple major versions of libjgrapht-java the archive (e.g. like we have multiple versions of libservlet2.X-java) > Steffen Moeller wrote me directly, saying he has very little time to > work on it. It seems that the other maintainer (Michael Koch) asked > Steffen to be removed from the uploader list[1]. >=20 > [1] > http://packages.qa.debian.org/libj/libjgrapht0.6-java/news/20090919T162= 248Z.html >=20 > Michael, do you confirm it? >=20 I would consider this very likely. Michael has been very difficult to reach lately and the last I heard from him was that he was busy with real life stuff. > More generally, are there any objections if I step in and package the > net version (0.8.something)? Right now, the only build-rdepends on > version 0.6 is cdk, which is also maintained within the Java team. Does= > anyone know whether the 0.6 dependency is still needed, or whether we > can maintain in the archive just one version (josm-plugins requires at > least version 0.7)? >=20 > Thanks, Giovanni. libjgrapht0.6-java is a "public" pkg-java package, so as long as you are a part of the pkg-java team, you are free to become its maintainer. Personally I encourage you to do it - especially if Steffen is busy and you have the time to spare. Unfortunately I do not know anything about the package here in question nor cdk. However, you can certainly prepare 0.8 and get it uploaded under a different name (libjgrapht0.8-java would be a sane choice). If cdk can be built with the new jgrapht, then we can just get the old one RMed. ~Niels
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature