Le mardi 08 décembre 2009 20:09:57, Onkar Shinde a écrit : > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Adrian Perez <adrianperez.deb@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello Mathias. > > > > Although is still an open discussion, we're making our best efforts to > > not build SWT from eclipse at all, and just make it depend on the > > swt-gtk generated packages. > > I am in agreement with Adrian here. There are at least two other > packages that depend on swt. If we don't maintain separate swt-gtk > package then for every bugfix that needs to be done to swt we will > need to upload new eclipse revision/version. This will unnecessarily > add to maintenance. You're right, it's the way to go : drop libswt-* packages from eclipse source tarball and replace them with packages from swt source package (and not the other way, as I said earlier). What's your timeline here : - Upload swt-gtk 3.5.1 source package as is ? - Remove eclipse swt packages now (seems a huge task) ? - Upload eclipse 3.5 unchanged ? Cheers, -- Damien Raude-Morvan - http://damien.raude-morvan.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.