Re: repackaging, git, version suffix
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Koch wrote:
> - Should all java stuff be repackaged? For example the xmlenc upstream
> tarball contains only one jar and some docs. I could as well have removed
> these files during package building.
You must remove any jars that are not built from the source in the package.
This includes any jar files of bundled external dependencies. In that case
the package should get a "dfsg" suffix and an appropriate note in
README.source.
It is optional to remove a jar or generated docs belonging to the package
itself. If this is the only change then I would usually prefer to keep the
upstream tarball intact.
Cheers,
Marcus
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAksczoEACgkQXjXn6TzcAQmMpwCgt4ItZT9j7d8+qYEFuspf0HfD
odMAnRyEXpR5WReTyhWaz8KMq5QdBJAs
=5yY7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: