[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: simple-xml



Am Dienstag, 13. Oktober 2009 17:27:02 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
> Le dimanche 11 octobre 2009 à 17:52 +0200, Fabian Köster a écrit :
> > > > * Package name    : simple-xml
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> > > > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/simple-xml
> > > > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian
> > > > unstable main contrib non-free
> > > > - dget
> > > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/simple-xml/simple-
> > > > xml_2.1.4-1.dsc
> > > >
> > > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
> > >
> > > Before, could you change a few things:
> > > * remove the two jar in lib/ and add a README.source to explain it
> >
> > Done.
> >
> > > * please add a watch file and a repack script which is going to remove
> > > lib/*.jar automatically
> >
> > OK. I added a watch-file, but unfortunately it does not work correctly. I
> > used the example for SourceForge-projects but the structure of the simple
> > releases is not unitary, see [1].
> > uscan reports: "Newest version on remote site is 2.1.1, local version is
> > 2.1.5". How can I fix this?
> 
> Excellent question. I would say that upstream didn't store them as the
>  usual place. You should ask him.

I will contact upstream.

> > I wrote a repack-script and placed it in debian/ but I am not sure if
> > this is what you meant. It takes the file-name of the original-upstream
> > tarball as argument, unpacks it, deletes the jar files and packs it
> > again.
> 
> It was pretty much it. I updated it to simplify the use with uscan.
> 
> Thanks for the other changes.
> I uploaded it

Thanks a lot for your efforts! I already learned a lot and your help really 
motivated me to go on and learn even more :) There are plenty of 
packages/software I would like to work on in the future!

With best regards,
Fabian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: