[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: SONAME for python modules is bad?



On 25.07.2009 05:47, Matthew Johnson wrote:
On Sat Jul 25 11:28, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Max Bowsher<maxb@f2s.com>  wrote:
...
It would be extremely nice too if all wrap language would adopt the
same convention. So that toolkit such as VTK/ITK/GDCM wrapping their
interface into multiple languages (namely: Tcl, Python, Java, C#)
could simply decide:
(1) Allow SONAME
(2) Use a directory convention libfoo-$SOVERSION/$NAME.so

for packaging mutiple modules.

It is unclear to me what you are trying to standardize.

How does one install multiple version of the same python/java/cli module ?

(speaking for Java) At the moment, you don't.

Wrong. It's already done, including a version in the file name and having a symlink to an unversioned jar. It should be possible to do something similiar with jni bindings.



Reply to: