Re: Request clarification on default-jdk vs. default-jdk-builddep

[Mathieu Malaterre <mathieu.malaterre@gmail.com>]

On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Max Bowsher<maxb@f2s.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been searching for any documentation / policy which explains when
> to use default-jdk vs. default-jdk-builddep in Build-Depends.
>
> Is it officially correct that a package should only build-depend on
> default-jdk-builddep if it builds a -gcj subpackage, and else
> build-depend on just default-jdk?
>
> I have seen this documented as such in Ubuntu resources, but have been
> unable to find any corroboration that the same holds true in Debian.

Indeed, I never realized that, I should fix my package.

http://wiki.edubuntu.org/JavaTeam/LibraryPackaging

Could someone please fix the debian policy too.

Thanks,

-- 
Mathieu