Re: For those who care about batik
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 1:24 AM, Eric Lavarde <deb@zorglub.s.bawue.de> wrote:
> I thought that Batik 1.7 is not backwards compatible with Batik 1.6 (I
> remember vaguely to have issues with this). If I'm right, wouldn't it make
> sense to have a batik1.7 package name and keep batik (1.6)?
IMO it wouldn't make much sense unless upstream is working on both
branches and releasing updates for them. There are only 3 reverse-deps
and one reverse-build-dep so it shouldn't be a very big transition
anyway.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: