[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS : Mina



Le Saturday 02 August 2008 00:40:41 Matthew Johnson, vous avez écrit :
> On Tue Jul 29 19:29, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
> Hi Damian,
>
> I've had a look over your package and may be able to sponsor it. I have
> a few comments first though, and I agree with the comments on short
> descriptions.

Hi,

Thank for taking care of this :)

>  - changelog: since it's not been uploaded to Debian yet, can you
>  combine the changelog entries into just one. Pretty much changelog
>  entries should correspond to uploads (and obviously the debian revision
>  will be 1)

It has been uploaded to my personnal debian repository and maybe (and _had 
been_, regarding Apache and FTP logs) installed by some debian users.

Using -1 for first Debian upload don't seems enforced by debian-policy and I 
prefer keeping history of want has been uploaded to mentors and to my 
personnal repository. Did you agree with that ?

>  - Licence for the packaging: you say it is licenced under the 'GPL'.
>  You should give the version of the GPL and note that the Apache licence
>  is not compatible with the GPLv2[0]. In general it is recommended for
>  packaging to be the same licence as the package, or a permissive one
>  such as BSD or X11/expat.

I've updated debian/copyright to licence Debian packaging under BSD licence 
which is more lenient witch Apache Mina licence.

>  - .vsd files: There seem to be a number of files under core/src/doc which
>  file(1) claims are Microsoft office documents. Are these used for
>  anything? Given you are stripping the tarball anyway you could probably
>  remove them?

You're right, I've stripped them from orig.tar.gz tarballs (via debian/rules 
get-orig-source)

>  - Other licence files: I assume these apply to the jars you stripped
>  out? It's not required, but it might be nice to strip them too to avoid
>  confusion as to why they aren't in debian/copyright

Idem, I've stripped this licences files.

> Both packages build and are lintian/pbuilder clean though, which is
> good.

I've upload a new version on m.d.o :
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mina/

Cheers,
-- 
Damien Raude-Morvan / www.drazzib.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: