Re: openjdk-6_6b08-1_i386.changes REJECTED
- To: Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>
- Cc: Thomas Viehmann <ftpmaster@debian.org>, Torsten Werner <twerner@debian.org>, Debian Installer <installer@ftp-master.debian.org>, debian-java@lists.debian.org, distro-pkg-dev@openjdk.java.net, openjdk@lists.launchpad.net
- Subject: Re: openjdk-6_6b08-1_i386.changes REJECTED
- From: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 01:32:56 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87hcdy20yf.fsf@vorlon.ganneff.de>
- Mail-followup-to: Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>, Thomas Viehmann <ftpmaster@debian.org>, Torsten Werner <twerner@debian.org>, Debian Installer <installer@ftp-master.debian.org>, debian-java@lists.debian.org, distro-pkg-dev@openjdk.java.net, openjdk@lists.launchpad.net
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 48091EAC.3050104@ubuntu.com> (Matthias Klose's message of "Sat\, 19 Apr 2008 00\:20\:28 +0200")
- References: <E1JmyOZ-0000va-QT@ries.debian.org> <[🔎] 48091EAC.3050104@ubuntu.com>
On 11360 March 1977, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> While you're doing stuff, you could also get rid of
>> - substvar-source-version-is-deprecated
> thanks for the hint, but this doesn't belong into a reject message.
It sure does not warrant an own mail and fits perfectly well if one is
writing anyways. It is a nice and added reminder. If you read the
text you see that its written "while you are doing stuff" and sure not
the reject reason. Take it as added service/value...
--
bye, Joerg
Yeah, patching debian/rules sounds like changing shoes while running the
100 meters track.
-- Michael Koch
Reply to: