ecj-gcj broken?
Hello,
I don't know if anybody else has run into this, but it appears that
ecj-gcj is broken (at least for me).
/usr/bin/javac -> /etc/alternatives/javac
/etc/alternatives/javac -> /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/javac
/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/javac -> /usr/bin/ecj
JAVA_HOME is unset.
[snip]
anuradha@ninsei:/ext/java$ sh -x /usr/bin/ecj Hello.java
+ case "$*" in
+ '[' '!' -f /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/jre/lib/rt.jar ']'
+ '[' -x /usr/bin/ecj-gcj ']'
+ exec /usr/bin/ecj-gcj Hello.java
----------
1. ERROR in Hello.java (at line 1)
class Hello {
^
The type java.lang.Object cannot be resolved. It is indirectly
referenced from required .class files
[/snip]
Where /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/jre/lib/rt.jar ->
../../../../../share/java/libgcj-4.2.jar.
But the following works:
[snip]
anuradha@ninsei:/ext/java$ sh -x /usr/bin/ecj -bootclasspath
/usr/share/java/libgcj-4.2.jar Hello.java
+ case "$*" in
+ '[' -x /usr/bin/ecj-gcj ']'
+ exec /usr/bin/ecj-gcj -bootclasspath /usr/share/java/libgcj.jar Hello.java
[/snip]
Anybody have any ideas why the default bootstrap jar isn't getting
loaded when no -bootclasspath argument is passed?
Thanks.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-vserver-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages ecj-gcj depends on:
ii ecj 3.3.0+0728-8 standalone version of the Eclipse
ii ecj-gcj [libecj-java-g 3.3.0+0728-8 standalone version of the Eclipse
ii libc6 2.7-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libecj-java-gcj 3.3.0+0728-8 Eclipse Java compiler (native libr
ii libgcc1 1:4.2.2-4 GCC support library
ii libgcj-bc 4.3-1 Link time only library for use wit
ii libgcj9-0 4.3.0-1 Java runtime library for use with
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-11 compression library - runtime
Versions of packages ecj-gcj recommends:
ii java-gcj-compat 1.0.76-5 Java runtime environment using GIJ
-- no debconf information
--
Anuradha Weeraman
http://www.linux.lk/~anu/
http://anuradha.wordpress.com
Reply to: