Re: Bug#413518: RFP 413518 Wagon package - granularity
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:42:38PM +0100, Paul Cager wrote:
> I think we generally agreed that the best way was "one source package",
> "many binary packages" (one per Jar). But I'm wondering if we should
> reconsider.
>
> Because of its "plug-in" architecture wagon has a number of very small
> Jars. For example the "wagon-file" and "ssh-external" Jars each have
> only one class in them. With separate binary packages we would end up
> with a number of packages containing trivial Jars.
>
> I suggest we use just one binary package (plus another -doc package, of
> course). Does that sound OK to everybody?
Ok. It really makes no sense to split this into many packages. I think
we can agree that we need to decide this on a case by case basis. ;-)
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
`. `' |
`- | 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436 95E6 F2E0 BD11 5923 A008 2763 483B
Reply to: