Re: gcj-4.1/arm

To: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>, debian-arm@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: gcj-4.1/arm
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:16:49 +0200
Message-id: <20070605081649.GL15265@deprecation.cyrius.com>
In-reply-to: <18020.24594.499265.75959@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
References: <20070523172932.GA682@kitenet.net> <18005.13018.975913.523029@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <465537E7.7050803@aurel32.net> <18020.24594.499265.75959@gargle.gargle.HOWL>

* Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> [2007-06-04 20:55]:
> I didn't see this failure yet. So maybe this is a bug in the libffi
> backport for arm? btw, Martin Michlmayr checked that Phil Blundell
> has a copyright assignment for GCC, so if somebody updates the arm
> libffi support for the trunk, I assume it can be submitted upstream.

Yes, Phil has a copyright assignment, so maybe Aurelien could clean
up Phil's patch and submit it upstream.  I noticed that java in 4.3
also doesn't work (even after adding this libffi patch) but I didn't
want to report it upstream before the libffi patch has been
submitted/discussed upstream.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcj-4.1/arm
  - From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>

References:
- Re: gcj-4.1/arm
  - From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>

Prev by Date: Re: gcj-4.1/arm
Next by Date: Re: gcj-4.1/arm
Previous by thread: Re: gcj-4.1/arm
Next by thread: Re: gcj-4.1/arm
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread