Steve Langasek writes: > so in the absence of any movement in this area, I still need to > know what Debian is going to do with gcj on ARM for the upcoming etch > release. in the worst case, remove the binaries built from gcj-4.1, ecj-bootstrap-gcj. How many build-dependencies will be broken? Didn't check, but it shouldn't be that many, because most packages are binary all.