Re: Fwd: Bug#360906: libhsqldb-java: should depend on java-runtime?
Hi,
as java-runtime is not a virtual package listed in the policy,
I would say that it's worth a bug against gij, which should provide
java1-runtime *and* java2-runtime (according to the current, in deed not
really practicable policy).
Eric
PS: no need to cc me on debian-java.
> Any suggestions on this? I think having java1-runtime and java2-runtime
> is meaningless in practice, but the policy calls for them and hsqldb
> will probably not work with Java <<2 runtime.
>
> ---------- Forwarded Message ----------
>
> Subject: Bug#360906: libhsqldb-java: should depend on java-runtime?
> Date: Wednesday 05 April 2006 14:42
> From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>
>
> Package: libhsqldb-java
> Version: 1.8.0.2-2
> Severity: minor
>
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to completely get rid off the Sun JRE in favor of the GIJ,
> but I can't, because
>
> - libhsqldb-java depends on java2-runtime
> - gij-4.0 provides java-runtime and java1-runtime only
>
> I don't know anything about Java, so I'm not sure where it's the
> problem: should libhsqldb-java depend on java-runtime or gij-4.0
> provide java2-runtime?
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
>
--
Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre
Reply to: