Re: GCJ native compilation

[Recai Oktaş <roktas@omu.edu.tr>]

* Michael Koch [2006-02-09 08:00:29+0100]
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 02:00:09AM +0200, Recai Okta? wrote:
> > Yes, I mean the later.  Then for the moment, I think including the 
> > lib*.so files in libpackage-java deb should be a reasonable choice 
> > (though it makes the package arch dependent)?  Otherwise I have to 
> > invent a name.
> 
> Why is it hard to "invent" libpackage-java-gcj? Sorry, I forgot to write
> about the *-gcj extension.

Thanks.  My thought was based on the last paragraph of §2.4 of Java policy.  
I'm going to use -gcj.

Cheers,

-- 
roktas