Re: GCJ Native Proposal
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:14:58 +0100,
Michael Koch <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> I would like to name the secondary native packages with a -jbi prefix
>> (Java Binary Interface). Some people like the name -bcabi because that
>> is what the GCJ folks tend to refer to it as. BC ABI: Binary Compatible
>> Application Binary Interface. I don't think bcabi is descriptive at all.
> -jbi is a bad name as none else on this planet knows the interface under
> this name I would prefer -bcabi (as this is the name its called
> upstream) or -gcj (to make clean where it comes from).
-bcabi like upstream would be a good idea.
: :' :rnaud
Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html