Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Java-Gnome: jni or cni

To: Momchil Velikov <velco@fadata.bg>
Cc: java-gnome-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, java@gcc.gnu.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org, kaffe@kaffe.org, sablevm-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Java-Gnome: jni or cni
From: Cedric Berger <cedric@berger.to>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:42:41 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 4051F691.50700@berger.to>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87r7vytn8m.fsf@freon.briz.fadata.bg>
References: <[🔎] 20040311174441.GA26451@pathfinderii.chu.cam.ac.uk> <[🔎] 1079031847.14886.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] 874qsuom1m.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <[🔎] 1079083849.17163.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] 87r7vytn8m.fsf@freon.briz.fadata.bg>

Momchil Velikov wrote:

 How about asking Sun to support CNI then ?

Because it's they who
limit your "freedoom of choice", by supporting only one (the
technically inferior, AIUI) interface.

Bleah
They technically cannot support it.
CNI doesn't work with precise copying collectors, AFAIK.
Cedric

Reply to:

References:
- Java-Gnome: jni or cni
  - From: Mark Howard <mh@debian.org>
- Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Java-Gnome: jni or cni
  - From: Elias Martenson <elias-m@algonet.se>
- Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Java-Gnome: jni or cni
  - From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
- Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Java-Gnome: jni or cni
  - From: Elias Martenson <elias-m@algonet.se>
- Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Java-Gnome: jni or cni
  - From: Momchil Velikov <velco@fadata.bg>

Prev by Date: Re: How complex is a natively built eclipse install? [was: Re: Report from the Debian Java developers meeting at FOSDEM]
Next by Date: Re: How complex is a natively built eclipse install?
Previous by thread: Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Java-Gnome: jni or cni
Next by thread: Re: [Sablevm-developer] Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Java-Gnome: jni or cni
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread