[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#227594: Seconding binfmt/JAR proposal



I second this proposal (reproduced below).

> I propose to change the following paragraphs in section 2.3 of the
> Debian Java policy
>
> > Programs must have executable(s) in /usr/bin and be executable. They
> > can be Java classes (using binfmt_misc) or wrappers. In any case,
> > they
> > must run without specific environment variables (see Policy 10.9),
> > for
> > instance CLASSPATH. They must respect the Policy rules for
> > executables
> > (for instance a manual page per executable, see  Policy 13.1).
>
> > If they have their own auxiliary classes, they must be in a jar file
> > in /usr/share/java. The name of the jar should folow the same naming
> > conventions as for libraries.
>
> to:
>
> Applications must provide one or more executable wrapper script(s) in 
> /usr/bin. They must run without specific environment variables (see 
> Policy 10.9), for instance JAVA_HOME or CLASSPATH. They must respect the 
> Policy rules for executables (for instance a manual page per executable, 
> see Policy 13.1).
>
> Additional classes in the package must be packaged in one or more JARs 
> which can be put into /usr/share/java (if they are intended to be used 
> by other programs) or into a private directory in /usr/share/<package>.

Ben.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: