[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.3-0.1 (i386 source)



Kalle Kivimaa <killer@debian.org> writes:

> Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> writes:
>> file.  Changelog entries should be focused on the change, not the bug, and
>> should be descriptive enough to allow someone who was not involved with the
>> bug report (e.g., most users of the package) to understand what changed.
>
> Is there any reason to include text saying "more info in BTS"? IMO
> there is a reason to refer to external sources (like Kaffe lists etc.)
> but isn't it obvious that BTS contains more information if a changelog
> entry closes a BTS bug?

Sure, next time, I'll follow the Grzegorz B. Prokopski's proposal, it's
the best I've seen ;)

> Just a cosmetic nitpick, thanks for the latest Kaffe!

Thanks.

-- 
  .''`. 
 : :' :rnaud
 `. `'  
   `-    



Reply to: