Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.3-0.1 (i386 source)
Kalle Kivimaa <killer@debian.org> writes:
> Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> writes:
>> file. Changelog entries should be focused on the change, not the bug, and
>> should be descriptive enough to allow someone who was not involved with the
>> bug report (e.g., most users of the package) to understand what changed.
>
> Is there any reason to include text saying "more info in BTS"? IMO
> there is a reason to refer to external sources (like Kaffe lists etc.)
> but isn't it obvious that BTS contains more information if a changelog
> entry closes a BTS bug?
Sure, next time, I'll follow the Grzegorz B. Prokopski's proposal, it's
the best I've seen ;)
> Just a cosmetic nitpick, thanks for the latest Kaffe!
Thanks.
--
.''`.
: :' :rnaud
`. `'
`-
Reply to: