A word from Etienne M. Gagnon - upstream author (forwarded). The name of the virtual machine is "SableVM", not "Sable VM". The > Sable Research Group of McGill+UQAM universities has many projects, > including SableCC and SableVM. Using the group name (Sable), instead > of the project name (SableVM) could cause much complications > "upstream", as if confused users start complaining that "Sable" is > buggy, what would they mean? Which of SableCC, SableVM, Soot is > buggy? Also, it gets difficult to distinguish between addressed to > the whole group and messages addressed to a particular project. > > Sorry for any trouble this is causing you (and for the extra two > characters). ;-) > > Regards, > > Etienne I'd like to add that: - in the request for wrapper there has been jikes-sablevm name requested - We'd like to have full consistency here, especially in the tool name. Using -sable for SableVM is at least inconsistent (see Etienne's explaination above). Because Adam seems to be serious on the voting thing - I need to ask you to vote "pro change". Else - I'll have to add jikes-sablevm wrapper somewhere to SableVM packages and this way - archive bloat will grow. Thank you for you understanding Grzegorz B. Prokopski -- Grzegorz B. Prokopski <gadek@debian.org> Debian http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature