Re: Bug#165504: acknowledged by developer (Re: ITA: junit-freenet -- basic reimplementation of the JUnit)
Hallo!
* Robert Millan <zeratul2@wanadoo.es> wrote:
> I think we should have a junit implementation in main; IBM's junit is
> preferred,
BTW: it's not 'IBMs Junit'. Only one of the Authors is employed by a
IBM owned company (OTI).
> If the junit maintainer agrees to drop junit's arbitrary dependencies on
> non-free components, then we'll have this problem solved. Otherwise someone
> will have to ITP junit-freenet again (and it seems that someone will have to
> be me.. *sigh*)
Just apart from the thing what good it is to have a testing framework
in main, if everything else (java development wise) is in contrib, if
kaffe is able to run junit, I also don't really see the point. If it
is... (JUnit makes much use of reflection and I don't know how good
kaffe is in that direction)
Jan
Reply to: