Re: java1-compiler instead java-compiler

[Juan Alvarez <jalvarez@fluidsignal.com>]

>>>>> "Keegan" == Keegan Quinn <kquinn@respond2.com> writes:

    Keegan> On Saturday 05 April 2003 05:58 pm, Juan Alvarez wrote:
    >> Looking to the debian meta-packages, I show the following
    >> packages:
    >> 
    >> java-compiler java2-compiler
    >> 
    >> java1-runtime java2-runtime
    >> 
    >> Why java-compiler dont be named java1-compiler? java1-compiler
    >> its more self explanatory.

    Keegan> This would seem more logical to me, as well.  Likely
    Keegan> java-compiler is older, from before this distinction was
    Keegan> made, though I haven't verified this.

    Keegan> java1-compiler could Provide: java-compiler to avoid
    Keegan> breaking dependancies.

So, what is tha apropiate procedure to this change be executed? a bug
against the virtual package or a bug against the policy.

    Keegan>  - Keegan

-- 
Juan Alvarez, Fluidsignal Group S.A.
Key fingerprint: 5F35 45B2 34BF 40E7 3AA9 98CE 6E92 E08B 1DDF 6D3C