JNI Installation Directories: Another push
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi, it's me yet again on this JNI issue.
> My suggestion is that you start filing wishlist bugs against the jvm:s
> and talk to blackdown folk (hi there! ;) ) or similar.
Well, I filed these wishlist bugs, complete with wrapper scripts that would
implement this JNI directory change, about three months ago. Bugs were filed
against gij-3.2, kaffe, sablevm, jdk1.1 and ibm-jdk1.1-installer, and an
email was also sent to the j2se1.4 maintainer (since this package does not
use the debian BTS).
In the intervening three months, absolutely nothing has been done for *any* of
these virtual machines, with the single exception of gij-3.2 (which,
incidentally, was the only virtual machine I know of that couldn't use the
patch I sent three months ago since it didn't support -Djava.library.path,
but which had a new upload within days of me providing a patch that
circumvented the -Djava.library.path problem).
A week or so ago I submitted source-level patches to the other JVMs in main
(kaffe and sablevm), i.e., patches which augment the JNI search path in the
JVM itself instead of relying on a clever wrapper script. I haven't done
this with the JVMs in non-free for the obvious reasons, but there are still
the wrapper scripts I provided.
> When it has been implemented on some important jvm:s (like kaffe,
> jdk1.1 and possibly j2re) I'll update the Debian policy.
It becomes increasingly apparent to me that if we wait for this JNI path
change to take place on "enough" JVMs, that this policy change will never
happen.
People seem to agree that this policy change is a good thing and patches have
been available for months. Can we just change policy now, upgrade these bugs
from wishlist to something more important, and then let the JVMs catch up?
Ben. :)
- --
Ben Burton
bab@debian.org
Public Key: finger bab@db.debian.org
When I started watching my behavior and seeing how I would control
people, and how they would control me, it was awareness. I want awareness
more than anything, and part of awareness is being able to honor the part
of you that's Lady Macbeth.
- Tori Amos
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+Q2XqMQNuxza4YcERAvwVAKCWJjEAdGj5LlFzH7U3pb89f3Dd7QCgh9QE
oF7w4WBLwi6ntNaaUR4Z+hI=
=QTH7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: