Re: Mass filing of bugs
- To: debian-java@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Mass filing of bugs
- From: Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 08:18:01 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20021202071801.GA868@chrystal.opal.dhs.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org>, debian-java@lists.debian.org
- Reply-to: opal@debian.org
- In-reply-to: <87u1hz6j6b.fsf@rabbit.fire-swamp.net>
- References: <20021121171621.GD4099@skyjammer.com> <20021122121658.GB17823@chrystal.opal.dhs.org> <20021122122846.GA18443@chrystal.opal.dhs.org> <3DDE2836.9010709@trustsec.de> <87of8hl4rb.fsf@rabbit.fire-swamp.net> <3DDEB1C5.50804@trustsec.de> <87el9dkwf6.fsf@rabbit.fire-swamp.net> <874ra18m0k.fsf_-_@rabbit.fire-swamp.net> <20021129105309.GA14374@chrystal.opal.dhs.org> <87u1hz6j6b.fsf@rabbit.fire-swamp.net>
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 09:50:36AM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> >>>>> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org> writes:
> Ola> Programs must depend on java-virtual-machine (because they
> Ola> will need it in order to run).
>
> Given's Dalibor Topic's comment on this list
> (<20021129114843.84059.qmail@web10001.mail.yahoo.com>), should we
> declare java[12]-runtime to be a superset of java-virtual-machine and
> just have packages depend on it instead. Has anyone tried using
I'd say no.
> Kaffe's classes against SableVM's JVM?
Have not tried.
Regards,
// Ola
> --
> Stephen
>
> "And what do we burn apart from witches?"... "More witches!"
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: