[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#166370: java-common: Virtual packages "jar" and "javadoc"

Package: java-common
Version: 0.16
Severity: wishlist

I think the java policy should, in addition to specifying the use of
java-virtual-machine, java-compler and java{1,}-runtime, also recommend
the use of the virtual packages "jar" and "javadoc" to ensure a package
that provides the alternatives /usr/bin/jar and /usr/bin/javadoc is

Without such virtual packages, a build-dependancy on java-compiler and
java1-runtime does not ensure the existance of either of those programs
(for example, they can be satisfied by jikes-classpath and classpath).

Debian policy says there has to be consensus on any virtual package that
is intended to be used by many packages of from different sources, so I
think java-policy and the java- is the place to decide on these.

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux ivanhoe.blckknght.org 2.4.19-local #1 Mon Sep 9 00:10:27 EDT =
2002 i686
Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3D

- -- no debconf information

Steven Barker                                      steve@blckknght.org
  Swap read error.  You lose your mind.
Get my GnuPG public key at: http://www.blckknght.org/publickey.asc
Fingerprint: 272A 3EC8 52CE F22B F745  775E 5292 F743 EBD5 936B

Attachment: pgpyl8kCXLegb.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: