[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Not yet a policy proposal but...



W liście z sob, 19-10-2002, godz. 22:56, Tom Tromey pisze: 
> >>>>> "Grzegorz" == Grzegorz Prokopski <gadek@debian.org> writes:
> 
> Grzegorz> If you look in two places - at #163197 (which says about
> Grzegorz> conflicting files, like /usr/include/jni.h, and for ex. at
> Grzegorz> output of: apt-cache show libgcj3-dev
> 
> Grzegorz> It may not be possible to standarize for every single JVM for
> Grzegorz> Debian, but I hope that at least GCJ people could agree on
> Grzegorz> sth, so that the others could just Conflicts: libgcj-dev.
> 
> Grzegorz> So if any GCJ developer can see it - I'd like to hear opinion.
> 
> What exactly is it you want to know?  I can answer gcj questions, and
> questions about our jni.h.  I don't know much about Debian packaging
> though.

hi!

I rethinked the thing and I'll handle it myself (the bug is
already closed).

The downside is that I will have to track all new versions of
libgcj*-dev and set Conflicts: with them in libsablevm1-dev.

This is purely packaging problem, sorry for the noise.

Regards

					Grzegorz B. Prokopski

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: