Re: Java Policy.
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 02:45:24PM -0400, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 05:41:29PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > http://people.debian.org/~opal/java/policy.html/policy.html
>
> The following,
>
> Both are shipped as Java bytecode (*.class files, packaged in a
> *.jar archive) and with an "Architecture: all" since Java
> bytecode is supposed to be portable.
>
> seems to forbid both code with native parts, and Java code compiled
> to machine binaries with gcj. It seems reasonable to me to allow
> both of these.
Well I do not really understand this. Java code is supposed to be
portable. If you compile it to machine binaries it is no longer a
java program and should not be packaged as a such. Non java
components should be extracted to a separate package IMHO.
Regards,
// Ola
> Andrew
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 584 36 LINKÖPING |
| +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: