[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: deb for netbeans



On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 01:12:49AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 12:45:24AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 06:37:14PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > > Ainsi parlait Vendredi 3 Mai 2002 04:12, Matt Zimmerman :
> > > > Assuming that it requires a Java2 virtual machine, it isn't useful with
> > > > software available in Debian, nor even with software in the non-free
> > > > archive, so the advantages of packaging it are substantially reduced.
> > 
> > No. The non-free section is not a part of debian. Packages in the contrib
> > section can depend on anything that is non free and still be distributable.
> > What it needs should be well described in its README.Debian file though.
> 
> Re-read what I wrote, and you will see that I made it perfectly clear that
> non-free was not included in "software available in Debian".
> 
> The software in question cannot even go into the non-free archive.
??

Now I do not really understand. As I have understood netbeans is
DFSG compliant (I have not checked but that is what people here tell
me) but depends on a java2-runtime which is not avable in Debian.

According to this netbeans can be distributed in the contrib section, right?

Regards,

// Ola
> -- 
>  - mdz
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 

-- 
 --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/  opal@debian.org                     Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11   \
|  opal@lysator.liu.se                 584 36 LINKÖPING         |
|  +46 (0)13-17 69 83                  +46 (0)70-332 1551       |
|  http://www.opal.dhs.org             UIN/icq: 4912500         |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: pgpUhzUdpAXJ_.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: