Re: [summary] Re: policy proposition for javadoc installation
Ainsi parlait GOMEZ Henri :
> >- should we contact FHS about this new directory (/usr/share/javadoc) ?
>
> Yes
Even if we switch to using standard /usr/share/doc instead, maybe we could
summarise relevant part of our policies to FHS anyway (usr/share/java, for
instance). Unless some Debian folks already did it ?
> >- is cross-linking of javadoc an interesting/achievable feature ?
> >When building foo package, depending of bar package, add -linkoffline
> >/usr/share/javadoc/bar option to javadoc would provide
> >cross-linked api
> >documentation
> >
> >Subsidiary question (personal curiosity):
> >i know ant documentation comes in ant-doc package on debian. But is it
> >installed in /usr/share/doc/ant (using the main package name) or
> >/usr/share/doc/ant-doc (using the actual documentation package name)
> >directory ?
> >On rpm system (at least mandrake), /usr/share/doc/ant contains basic
> >readme.txt, license.txt, etc, while real manual get installed in
> >/usr/share/doc/ant-manual.
> >This is important as we have to decide if ant javadoc will go in
> >/usr/share/javadoc/ant or /usr/share/javadoc/ant-javadoc :-)
>
> +1 for /usr/share/javadoc/ant
Then we have a technical problem to solve (sorry to bother Debian people
there). As it concerns only rpm, i'll respond on jpackage-devel list only.
--
Guillaume Rousse <rousse@ccr.jussieu.fr>
GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html
Reply to: