Re: kaffe status

[Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>]

Adam Heath wrote:

> On 20 Nov 2001, Tom Tromey wrote:
>
> > > > > > > "Ben" == Ben Burton <benb@acm.org> writes:
> > > > Well, the gcj runtimes (libgcj or whatever the package name is)
> > > > should be fixed to provide java-runtime.
> > Ben> Oh.. I had figured it was a deliberate decision on behalf of the
> > Ben> gcc maintainers not to provide java-runtime (for reasons such as
> > Ben> command-line incompatibility, etc).
> >
> > If that's the case, please have them file bug reports in the gcc Gnats
> > system.  I'd be interested in addressing the problems, if only I knew
> > what they were.
>
> Why in gnats?  gnats has nothing to do with the debian meta information.
I believe Tom meant:  If you find a problem where gij is command-line
incompatible with javac, then we consider that a bug in gij, not in the
debian packaging of gij, and so the bug should be reported to the "upstream"
maintainers - which means using gnats.

   --Per