Re: kaffe status

[Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>]

Ben Burton wrote:

> > Well, the gcj runtimes (libgcj or whatever the package name is)
> > should be fixed to provide java-runtime.
>
> Oh.. I had figured it was a deliberate decision on behalf of the gcc 
> maintainers not to provide java-runtime (for reasons such as command-line 
> incompatibility, etc).
The "gij" command tries to be more-or-less compatible with the "java" 
command.

If by "gcc maintainers" you means the Debian gcc maintainers, I don't know
who they are.  But if you mean the people actually developing gcj, well I
don't know if any of them are involved in maintaining Debian packages.
   --Per