Re: package names question about avalon
On Mon, 2001-10-29 at 14:01, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> I ITPd avalon framework and avalon excalibur which are Jakarta
> Avalon's product(http://jakarta.apache.org/avalon/).
Excellent!
> jpackage project uses avalon-framework and avalon-excalibur. If I'll
> follow jpackage project, I should name libavalon-excalibur-java and
> libavalon-framework-java. But I don't like such long package name. I
> prefer libavalon-java (avalon for source) and libexcalibur-java
> (excalibur for source) because upstream source directory name are
> 'Avalon' and 'Excalibur'.
>
> Does anybody have other opinion?
I'm for libavalon-framework-java et al, as that is the full name of the
product, the name of the CVS modules and the names that jpackage use.
Ross Burton
Reply to: