Re: RFC: JVM Registry
On Wednesday 12 September 2001 17:30, Ben Burton wrote:
> > What about using XML instead?
> The initial reason for suggesting plain text was that (1) it seemed like
> it would handle the task well enough, i.e. I didn't see a natural tree
> structure on the data, and (2) it's easier to inspect and edit by hand.
Nope. XML is easier to read, certainly if small changes are to be added.
But let's not start *that* flame war...
> Having said that, I'm personally not fussed in the slightest about the
> format of said files. I'm more concerned with their existance. :)