Re: org/w3c/dom duplicates in lib-dom-java and lib-openxml-java,libxerces-java!
On Wednesday 30 May 2001 21:14, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 09:08:03PM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 May 2001 20:48, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> > > It is fine to split packages into the official API classes, and
> > > supporting classes. However, it is not fine to say that there can
> > > be only one "official API classes" package for a given spec (eg, DOM
> > > Level 1).
> >
> > I agree. But the interface classes should in all cases be exactly the
> > same...
>
> Perhaps I am naive, but I don't see why. The API's of these classes
> should always be the same, but different implementations _of the API
> classes_ are possible.
It is wording... i guess we mean the same thing. For me an interface class
is like:
public interface CDOInterface {
}
Though it is not a "public class CDOInterface" it gives a .class file...
Egon
Reply to: