Re: RFC: provides: java-servlet-engine
On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Seth Arnold wrote:
> * Nic Ferrier <firstname.lastname@example.org> [001216 09:59]:
> > >>> Thom May <email@example.com> 16-Dec-00 3:28:18 PM >>>
> > >So, in the control file i'd like to be able to specify "requires:
> > >java-servlet-engine" and let apt get on with it, rather than
> > >saying "requires: apache-jserv|tomcat" etc.
> > There are now quite a few servlet dependant tools out there. I would
> > like to see this done as well, for 2 reasons:
> If I am not mistaken to precedence, the use precedes policy. Email the
> maintainers, and ask them to include the Provides: line. :)
You are mistaken.
<-- snip -->
Packages MUST NOT use virtual package names (except privately, amongst
a cooperating group of packages) unless they have been agreed upon and
appear in this list.
The procedure for updating the list is as follows:
1. Post to debian-devel saying what names you intend to use or what
other changes you wish to make, and file a wish list bug against the
2. Wait a few days for comment (some of the comments may be on the
debian-policy list, if you are not subscribed, ask for mail to be CC'd
3. Mail the maintainer of the virtual package name list (which is the
Debian Policy list <firstname.lastname@example.org>) notifying them
of the consensus reached (or your suggestions if noone objected).
Please update the bug report at the same time (retitling the bug to
Please include a proposed brief description of the new virtual name(s)
for the list. The list maintainer will then post the new list to
debian-devel and upload it to the FTP site.
4. Go and use the new or changed names.
<-- snip -->
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
-- Mahatma Ghandi