Re: t-code: useful to keep in Debian?

To: noshiro@debian.org, debian-japanese@lists.debian.org
Cc: pabs@debian.org, osamu@debian.org, dancer@netfort.gr.jp, kmuto@debian.org
Subject: Re: t-code: useful to keep in Debian?
From: Tatsuya Kinoshita <tats@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 12:57:39 +0900 (JST)
Message-id: <[🔎] 20071201.125739.160684951.tats%nobody@tats.iris.ne.jp>
In-reply-to: <20071127.234522.247135757.tats%nobody@tats.iris.ne.jp>
References: <20071125.223409.149977569.tats%nobody@tats.iris.ne.jp> <20071126.223435.74750865.noshiro@shigeo.jp> <20071127.234522.247135757.tats%nobody@tats.iris.ne.jp>

On November 27, 2007 at 11:45PM +0900,
tats (at debian.org) wrote:

> On November 26, 2007 at 10:34PM +0900,
> noshiro (at debian.org) wrote:
>
> > I'm very busy to my job.
> > I use t-code package everyday (love it),
> > but I don't have time for maintenance.
> >
> > Could anyone NMU it?
>
> OK, to fix the t-code bugs, I'll probably do NMU next month.

Uploaded.

Thanks,
--
Tatsuya Kinoshita

Attachment: pgpY5OjYQDs83.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Next by Date: phpmyadmin 4:2.11.2-3: Please update debconf PO translation for the package phpmyadmin
Next by thread: phpmyadmin 4:2.11.2-3: Please update debconf PO translation for the package phpmyadmin
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread