Re: bash in at command

To: debian-italian@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: bash in at command
From: "Bertorello, Marco" <me@marcobertorello.it>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 11:37:41 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] ba61ed87-face-1e4a-db9a-a45a07668bd5@marcobertorello.it>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Yzv2mfhDCXIY82qx@arcana.i.gnudd.com>
References: <[🔎] b089e015-55ba-6088-6ace-867f1d3856c7@riminilug.it> <[🔎] 102ff6c4-3172-ea5c-92e7-3814a2586b4e@riminilug.it> <[🔎] CAJSjkBNDcc-XCjjPxtgj=xcmip4rmoRhCs__8PkMC04uuoVQ-w@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 1db2d3e0-9090-57f0-3f66-74fca107e569@riminilug.it> <[🔎] CAJSjkBO5UFCN2Ad_Ycr3AmD0oqXa4XzN-zLfaRgYu66n0t81Nw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] Yzv2mfhDCXIY82qx@arcana.i.gnudd.com>


Il 04/10/2022 11:02, Alessandro Rubini ha scritto:

Quindi at esiste ancora? Incredibile. Niente systemd-at? Non ditelo in
giro...


in effetti è strano, su Debian GNU/SystemD

:D

--
Marco Bertorello
https://www.marcobertorello.it

Reply to:

References:
- Re: bash in at command
  - From: Piviul <piviul@riminilug.it>
- bash in at command
  - From: Piviul <piviul@riminilug.it>
- Re: bash in at command
  - From: Gabriele Zappi <gabriele.zappi@gmail.com>
- Re: bash in at command
  - From: Piviul <piviul@riminilug.it>
- Re: bash in at command
  - From: Gabriele Zappi <gabriele.zappi@gmail.com>
- Re: bash in at command
  - From: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@arcana.linux.it>

Prev by Date: Re: bash in at command
Next by Date: Re: bash in at command
Previous by thread: Re: bash in at command
Next by thread: Re: bash in at command
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread