Re: cdrecord: bad fifosize in defaults
Proprio nessuno che riesca a darmi una mano?
Grazie in anticipo a chi solo abbia un'idea di dove posso mettere mano.
Paolo
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 22:28:02 +0100, paolo <paolo.larcheri@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ciao lancio "cdrecord -scanbus", in output ho:
> "cdrecord: Bad fifo size in defaults."
>
> Vi allego qua sotto il mio file /etc/defaults/cdrecord:
> ----------
> CDR_DEVICE=cdrw
> CDR_FIFOSIZE=30m
> cdrw= 1,0,0 2 30m ""
> ----------
>
> Se eseguo "cdrecord dev=ATA: -scanbus" l'output è:
> ----------
> Cdrecord-Clone 2.01a38 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2004
> Jörg Schilling
> NOTE: this version of cdrecord is an inofficial (modified) release of cdrecord
> and thus may have bugs that are not present in the original version.
> Please send bug reports and support requests to
> <cdrtools@packages.debian.org>.
> The original author should not be bothered with problems of this version.
>
> cdrecord: Warning: Running on Linux-2.6.8-486
> cdrecord: There are unsettled issues with Linux-2.5 and newer.
> cdrecord: If you have unexpected problems, please try Linux-2.4 or Solaris.
> cdrecord: Warning: Linux-2.6.8 introduced incompatible interface changes.
> cdrecord: Warning: SCSI transport does no longer work for suid root programs.
> cdrecord: Warning: if cdrecord fails, try to run it from a root account.
> scsidev: 'ATA:'
> devname: 'ATA'
> scsibus: -1 target: -1 lun: -1
> Warning: Using badly designed ATAPI via /dev/hd* interface.
> Linux sg driver version: 3.5.27
> Using libscg version 'schily-0.8'.
> scsibus1:
> 1,0,0 100) 'TOSHIBA ' 'DVD-ROM SD-R6112' '1332' Removable CD-ROM
> 1,1,0 101) *
> 1,2,0 102) *
> 1,3,0 103) *
> 1,4,0 104) *
> 1,5,0 105) *
> 1,6,0 106) *
> 1,7,0 107) *
> ----------
>
> Sono alquanto niubbo in materia... ho googlato ma "bad fifosize" non
> mi porta a niente.
> Qualche idea? Vi prego se riesco a masterizzare sotto linux, lascio
> per sempre il mondo di Bill... è l'ultima cosa che riesco a fare in
> win e in linux no!!!
>
> Grazie mille
>
> Paolo
>
Reply to: