[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Last Chance: 99 cent tote bags - 3 styles to choose from



Educator,

Our customers have spoken and we have listened. 99 cent tote bags are 
back by popular demand - and now better than ever with 3 styles to 
choose from. Check out these $.99 tote bags now:

http://pgiproducts.net/?mId=-1999999310&ID=3980675216&L=37878-1C&C=37845&T=0000&M=EM&E=1

Not just another tote bag, these 3 styles of non-woven tote bags are 
an Eco-Responsible product with a very low price tag. Made from a 
sturdy non-woven material (and available in up to 28 color 
combinations),these bags can be reused over and over again to carry 
books,school supplies or anything else you might need. But don't 
delay,the 99 cent price on these bags won't last long!


Sincerely,
Thomas Lombardi
Progressive Gifts & Incentives
376 Technology Drive
Malvern, PA 19355

This message was sent from a send-only mailbox that is unable to 
accept replies. If you wish to contact us, please call us at 
888-557-2708.

If you would like to update your email address, manage your email
preferences or if you do not want to receive PGI product updates in
the future go to:
http://www.pgiproducts.net/emailpref/default.asp?ID=3980675216&O=1

priority code = e0675216-2984.
ContactID#: -1926873597                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               


Reply to: